Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759459AbZFKDvJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:51:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756033AbZFKDux (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:50:53 -0400 Received: from e37.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.158]:58579 "EHLO e37.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754783AbZFKDuw (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:50:52 -0400 From: Subrata Modak To: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Linuxppc-dev Cc: Sachin P Sant , Linux-Kernel , Linux-Next , Stephen Rothwell , Subrata Modak , Balbir Singh Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:20:46 +0530 Message-Id: <20090611035046.22125.26641.sendpatchset@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> Subject: [PATCH][BUILD FAILURE 03/04] Next June 04:PPC64 randconfig [drivers/net/lance.o] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2131 Lines: 54 Hi Benjamin/Paul, >On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 19:02 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote: >CC drivers/net/lance.o > drivers/net/lance.c: In function 'lance_probe1': > drivers/net/lance.c:575: error: implicit declaration of function 'isa_virt_to_bus' > drivers/net/lance.c: In function 'lance_rx': > drivers/net/lance.c:1197: error: implicit declaration of function 'isa_bus_to_virt' > make[2]: *** [drivers/net/lance.o] Error 1 > make[1]: *** [drivers/net] Error 2 > make: *** [drivers] Error 2 Reference: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/4/240, To fix the following build error: drivers/net/lance.c: In function 'lance_probe1': drivers/net/lance.c:575: error: implicit declaration of function 'isa_virt_to_bus' drivers/net/lance.c: In function 'lance_rx': drivers/net/lance.c:1197: error: implicit declaration of function 'isa_bus_to_virt' make[2]: *** [drivers/net/lance.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** [drivers/net] Error 2 make: *** [drivers] Error 2 I would like to propose the following patch. The prototypes for the functions: 'isa_virt_to_bus' & 'isa_virt_to_bus' are existing for some archs like the mips, x86, parisc, arm & alpha, but, is missing for powerpc. Is it safe to introduce the following soultion for powerpc ? It fixes the build problem i reported earlier. Signed-off-by: Subrata Modak --- --- linux-2.6.30-rc8/arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h.orig 2009-06-10 21:56:49.000000000 -0500 +++ linux-2.6.30-rc8/arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h 2009-06-10 22:21:35.000000000 -0500 @@ -680,6 +680,9 @@ extern void __iounmap_at(void *ea, unsig #define mmio_outsw(addr, src, count) writesw(addr, src, count) #define mmio_outsl(addr, src, count) writesl(addr, src, count) +#define isa_virt_to_bus virt_to_phys +#define isa_bus_to_virt phys_to_virt + /** * virt_to_phys - map virtual addresses to physical * @address: address to remap --- Regards-- Subrata -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/