Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S310259AbSCEVcm>; Tue, 5 Mar 2002 16:32:42 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S310270AbSCEVce>; Tue, 5 Mar 2002 16:32:34 -0500
Received: from quechua.inka.de ([212.227.14.2]:11094 "EHLO mail.inka.de")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S310259AbSCEVcV>;
	Tue, 5 Mar 2002 16:32:21 -0500
From: Bernd Eckenfels <ecki-news2002-02@lina.inka.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Monolithic Vs. Microkernel
In-Reply-To: <20020304144923.A96@toy.ucw.cz>
X-Newsgroups: ka.lists.linux.kernel
User-Agent: tin/1.5.8-20010221 ("Blue Water") (UNIX) (Linux/2.0.39 (i686))
Message-Id: <E16iMXl-00040Y-00@sites.inka.de>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 22:32:21 +0100
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

In article <20020304144923.A96@toy.ucw.cz> you wrote:
> modules and are not protected from module bugs. Try developing filesystem
> on production box.... You can do that on u-kernels.

Well, I agree that debugging get's easier if you do not crash your box every
now and then. But on the other hand... who is developing on production boxes?!
Is that usual suse policy? :)

Greetings
Bernd
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/