Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S292320AbSCEWel>; Tue, 5 Mar 2002 17:34:41 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S292428AbSCEWe2>; Tue, 5 Mar 2002 17:34:28 -0500
Received: from charlie-chuck-chuck.com ([206.104.238.26]:58509 "HELO
	titan.affordablehost.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP
	id <S292293AbSCEWdW>; Tue, 5 Mar 2002 17:33:22 -0500
Message-ID: <20020305223338.20714.qmail@titan.affordablehost.com>
From: "rddunlap" <rddunlap@xenotime.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, opensource@cis.ohio-state.edu
Subject: Re: Petition Against Official Endorsement of BitKeeper by Linux Maintainers
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2002 22:33:37 GMT
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

| The Open Source Club at The Ohio State University wrote:
| >
| > [ succinctness ]
| > 

| fwiw, I prefer to not use bitkeeper, for the reasons which
| you outline. 

| That's my choice.  Others have made a different one.   I ask that
| they ensure that their choice not inhibit my ability to contribute
| to Linux. 

Well said, Andrew.  And I agree completely. 

 ~Randy 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/