Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754744AbZFKNiJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:38:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751833AbZFKNh6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:37:58 -0400 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:48549 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751621AbZFKNh5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:37:57 -0400 Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 14:37:36 +0100 From: Russell King - ARM Linux To: Tony Lindgren Cc: Alan Cox , David Miller , swetland@google.com, pavel@ucw.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, san@android.com, rlove@google.com Subject: Re: HTC Dream aka. t-mobile g1 support Message-ID: <20090611133736.GP795@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20090611111821.GK795@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20090611.042226.28424489.davem@davemloft.net> <20090611114911.GL795@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20090611.050030.169859977.davem@davemloft.net> <20090611123852.GM795@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20090611135442.6b9ab315@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20090611132134.GA11199@atomide.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090611132134.GA11199@atomide.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1518 Lines: 31 On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 06:21:35AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > We've done this for two merge windows now for omap patches where the > patches have been posted to linux-arm-kernel, then they go into the > for-next tree, and then Russell merges them in. > > It has worked OK, although Russell had some comments about having hard > time keeping track on what he had reviewed already. Yes, as I understand it, there was a closed room discussion between several folk about how you'd handle sending your next round of patches to me. What you apparantly decided (and I'm saying this from how it appeared on the receiving end and sort-of had it confirmed by Kevin in conference) is that you'd send a patch set for me to review, I'd review it, and then you'd merge it within your git tree into a branch for me. You'd then do the same thing with the next patch set, and so forth. Eventually, near the merge window, you sent a pull request for the entire lot, by which time I looked at the list of changes and wondered whether that encompassed everything you'd asked me to review, or whether it contained extra stuff, or whether it was for something quite different, or what. So by separating the review from the merge by weeks or even months, it created additional problems. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/