Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 5 Mar 2002 18:20:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 5 Mar 2002 18:19:54 -0500 Received: from monk.debian.net ([216.185.54.61]:26292 "EHLO monk.verbum.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 5 Mar 2002 18:19:42 -0500 Subject: Re: [opensource] Re: Petition Against Official Endorsement of BitKeeper by Linux Maintainers From: Colin Walters To: Mike Fedyk Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, opensource@cis.ohio-state.edu In-Reply-To: <20020305230143.GB5538@matchmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20020305165233.A28212@fireball.zosima.org> <20020305154147.A6211@vger.timpanogas.org> <1015368059.25841.12.camel@space-ghost> <20020305230143.GB5538@matchmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0 (Preview Release) Date: 05 Mar 2002 18:19:13 -0500 Message-Id: <1015370353.25855.21.camel@space-ghost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2002-03-05 at 18:01, Mike Fedyk wrote: > Use is another way of advocacy. When you start using something, you get > used to it, Sure. > and when you talk to others, you end up advocating it because > it's what you're used to, and probably other options aren't as good (to you). There is a difference between advocating something personally, and advocating it in one's official capacity as the maintainer of a project. It is the latter "official" sense which the petition is against. > IIRC, bitkeeper, is open source. It just doesn't have a free license. I > could be wrong(I haven't checked). If I am, someone will say so... You are wrong. http://www.mit.edu/afs/athena/user/x/i/xiphmont/Public/critique.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/