Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S293650AbSCEXnz>; Tue, 5 Mar 2002 18:43:55 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S293489AbSCEXnq>; Tue, 5 Mar 2002 18:43:46 -0500
Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:17162 "EHLO
	the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S293243AbSCEXng>; Tue, 5 Mar 2002 18:43:36 -0500
Subject: Re: Petition Against Official Endorsement of BitKeeper by Linux Maintainers
To: opensource-admin@cis.ohio-state.edu (TheOpenSourceClubatTheOhioStateUniversity)
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 23:58:06 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, opensource@cis.ohio-state.edu
In-Reply-To: <20020305165233.A28212@fireball.zosima.org> from "TheOpenSourceClubatTheOhioStateUniversity" at Mar 05, 2002 04:52:34 PM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <E16iOoo-0004mw-00@the-village.bc.nu>
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Right from the start Linus has always said he isn't going to force anyone
to use bitkeeper. End of story. If you think its free enough -  use it, if
you don't (or you just think its crap software, dont use it)

In fact if it offends you enough to start a petition take the list of
names you get at the end and between you go write a better one under a
licence you prefer between the signatures.

Aan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/