Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764516AbZFLOBI (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Jun 2009 10:01:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751996AbZFLOAx (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Jun 2009 10:00:53 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:60335 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753242AbZFLOAw (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Jun 2009 10:00:52 -0400 Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:00:46 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Pekka Enberg Cc: Vegard Nossum , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] kmemcheck for mainline Message-ID: <20090612140046.GI32105@elte.hu> References: <20090612132443.GA24002@damson.ad.medicalresearch.no> <84144f020906120657j31fb3e82t2da251d31db6ba92@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <84144f020906120657j31fb3e82t2da251d31db6ba92@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.5 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1583 Lines: 40 * Pekka Enberg wrote: > Hi Linus, > > On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Vegard Nossum wrote: > > Please consider pulling the kmemcheck tree; > > > > kmemcheck is a feature which can (at run-time) detect some uses of > > uninitialized memory within the kernel, similarly to what Valgrind's memcheck > > does for userspace programs. We also have the ability to find use-after-free > > errors and leaks of uninitialized data to userspace, both with a false- > > positive rate of zero. > > > > kmemcheck is self-contained in the sense that when CONFIG_KMEMCHECK=n, it has > > no effect on the compiled kernel whatsoever. Our code has lived in the -tip > > tree and been in -next for over a year, and has the acks of x86 and slab > > maintainers (Ingo and Pekka). Inclusion in mainline would lower the threshold > > for building and running kmemcheck-enabled kernels, which would also > > hopefully increase testing coverage of the rest of the kernel code. > > I hope I didn't burn all my karma for this merge window with the slab > early boot patches but: > > Acked-by: Pekka Enberg > > for this pull request. +1 I've been testing kmemcheck in -tip for 1.5 years meanwhile and in terms of maintenance overhead it was never troublesome to have around. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/