Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764695AbZFLOIJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Jun 2009 10:08:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753014AbZFLOHx (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Jun 2009 10:07:53 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:40732 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756148AbZFLOHw (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Jun 2009 10:07:52 -0400 Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:07:30 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Linus , Peter Zijlstra , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, paulus@samba.org, ppc-dev Subject: Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure Message-ID: <20090612140730.GJ32105@elte.hu> References: <20090612102427.32582baa.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <1244768406.7172.1.camel@pasglop> <20090612092054.GB32052@elte.hu> <1244799197.7172.106.camel@pasglop> <20090612125335.GH31845@elte.hu> <1244812224.7172.146.camel@pasglop> <20090612134428.GC32105@elte.hu> <1244814976.7172.164.camel@pasglop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1244814976.7172.164.camel@pasglop> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.5 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1489 Lines: 37 * Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 15:44 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > This is certainly doable for agreeable features - which is the bulk > > - and it is being done. > > > > But this is a catch-22 for _controversial_ new features - which > > perfcounters clearly was, in case you turned off your lkml > > subscription ;-) > > I didn't :-) My point here is that Linus can make a decision with > an email -before- merging so that -next gets a chance, at least > for a couple of days, to do the integration testing once the > controversy has been sorted by his highness. Uhm, the bug you are making a big deal of would have been found and fixed by Paulus a few hours after any such mail - and probably by me too as i do daily cross builds to Power. So yes, we had a bug, but any extra linux-next hoops would not have prevented it: i could still have messed up by getting lured by that nice piece of Power7 hardware enablement patch on the last day ;-) So the bug was my fault for being too fast-and-loose with that particular patch, creating a ~5-commits-hop build breakage bisection window on Power. Now that i'm sufficiently chastised, can we now move on please? :) Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/