Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S293053AbSCFCSj>; Tue, 5 Mar 2002 21:18:39 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S293068AbSCFCS3>; Tue, 5 Mar 2002 21:18:29 -0500
Received: from CPEdeadbeef0000.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com ([24.100.234.67]:2564
	"HELO coredump.sh0n.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP
	id <S293053AbSCFCSM>; Tue, 5 Mar 2002 21:18:12 -0500
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 21:19:38 -0500 (EST)
From: Shawn Starr <spstarr@sh0n.net>
To: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
cc: Dave Jones <davej@suse.de>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [opensource] Re: Petition Against Official Endorsement of
 BitKeeper by Linux Maintainers
In-Reply-To: <20020306015049.GA336@matchmail.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.40.0203052118540.278-100000@coredump.sh0n.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


well let's see, it takes forever to do a bk clone its the verfication that
slows things down hugely.

Shawn.


On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, Mike Fedyk wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 08:46:27PM -0500, Shawn Starr wrote:
> >
> > The only problem I have with BK is it's slow on a Pentium 200Mhz, vs
> > CVS. ;/ Wish that would be fixed.
> >
>
> How much (wall clock) time will it take to produce a patch with bk
> compared to cvs?
>
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/