Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763052AbZFMAjA (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Jun 2009 20:39:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750880AbZFMAiv (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Jun 2009 20:38:51 -0400 Received: from aeryn.fluff.org.uk ([87.194.8.8]:52295 "EHLO kira.home.fluff.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750709AbZFMAiv (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Jun 2009 20:38:51 -0400 Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 01:38:49 +0100 From: Ben Dooks To: David Miller Cc: linux@arm.linux.org.uk, pavel@ucw.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, ibm@android.com, swetland@google.com, san@android.com, rlove@google.com Subject: Re: HTC Dream aka. t-mobile g1 support Message-ID: <20090613003849.GC20442@fluff.org.uk> References: <20090610103131.GB13885@elf.ucw.cz> <20090610194852.GA28787@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20090611.000219.206893038.davem@davemloft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090611.000219.206893038.davem@davemloft.net> X-Disclaimer: These are my own opinions, so there! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1620 Lines: 37 On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 12:02:19AM -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Russell King - ARM Linux > Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 20:48:52 +0100 > > > In short not as far as I know, and I'm very disappointed with the state > > of affairs with google. > > And of course, this whole android situation has absolutely nothing to > do with how much of a pain in that ass you are to deal with as ARM > maintainer. If you mean 'pain' as 'having standards', then you're probably right. I bet some of the moaning is coming from the people who seem to expect that since they've written some cess-pool which sort of works for their specific case (a number of vendors fit this category) then they have some right to expect it to be merged into mainline. What's worse is that often trying to convince the vendors that their paritcualy pile of sick is in need of work either gets ignored by the management or if taken in by the techies, is often lost as a these 'porting' teams are often disbanded or moved onto something else by the time the next task comes around. If it wasn't for people with some form of standards devoting their time to trying to keep the tide of evil that some of these companies try to perpetrate out of the kernel, we'd be swimming in an unmanagable mess by now. -- Ben (ben@fluff.org, http://www.fluff.org/) 'a smiley only costs 4 bytes' -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/