Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S293417AbSCFJlP>; Wed, 6 Mar 2002 04:41:15 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S293423AbSCFJlF>; Wed, 6 Mar 2002 04:41:05 -0500
Received: from ns.suse.de ([213.95.15.193]:34059 "HELO Cantor.suse.de")
	by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id <S293417AbSCFJkq>;
	Wed, 6 Mar 2002 04:40:46 -0500
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Petition Against Official Endorsement of BitKeeper by Linux   Maintainers
In-Reply-To: <20020305165233.A28212@fireball.zosima.org.suse.lists.linux.kernel> <3C8543CC.A6017F76@zip.com.au.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Date: 06 Mar 2002 10:40:44 +0100
In-Reply-To: Andrew Morton's message of "5 Mar 2002 23:21:01 +0100"
Message-ID: <p73vgca11b7.fsf@oldwotan.suse.de>
Lines: 17
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.6
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au> writes:

> The Open Source Club at The Ohio State University wrote:
> > 
> > [ succinctness ]
> >
> 
> fwiw, I prefer to not use bitkeeper, for the reasons which
> you outline.

I also prefer not to use Bitkeeper as long as possible for similar reasons 
and because it is too slow and clumpsy 
(although it is already very hard because often source is only available 
through it, e.g. for ppc or for 2.5 pre patches now -- hopefully this trend
does not continue)

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/