Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763735AbZFNUm1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Jun 2009 16:42:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759560AbZFNUmT (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Jun 2009 16:42:19 -0400 Received: from pfepa.post.tele.dk ([195.41.46.235]:38230 "EHLO pfepa.post.tele.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754876AbZFNUmT (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Jun 2009 16:42:19 -0400 Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 22:44:37 +0200 From: Sam Ravnborg To: Mike Frysinger Cc: kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Linux kernel mailing list , uclinux-dist-devel Subject: Re: scripts/kallsyms: extending region checking for Blackfin memory regions Message-ID: <20090614204437.GC3187@uranus.ravnborg.org> References: <8bd0f97a0906081623h4dc26492kd70c2e07091730d@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8bd0f97a0906081623h4dc26492kd70c2e07091730d@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1593 Lines: 37 On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 07:23:16PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > intro: the current Blackfin memory architecture is (1) no virtualized > memory and (2) distinctly harvard. that means we cannot create a > linear map of start/end text sections. we end up with distinct > regions like so: > 00001000 T __stext > 000dc4c0 T __etext > feb00000 A __etext_l2 > feb00010 A __stext_l2 > ffa00000 T __stext_l1 > ffa0160c T __etext_l1 > this is because external memory starts at address 0 while on-chip > regions have different discontiguous hardcoded addresses (L1 > instruction in this case starts at 0xffa00000 while L2 starts at > 0xfeb00000). > > the current kallsyms is written to search for the special stext/etext > symbols only which means the resulting kallsyms output knows nothing > of the Blackfin symbols living in these on-chip regions. we've > written two patches to fix this: the first one is straight forward and > simply copies & pastes the existing hardcoded regions. the second > creates an array of text regions which makes it much easier to extend > in the future for other people (and can be squashed into the first > one). > > doesnt matter to me which method is picked :) I added both as I liked the generalization. I had to rearrange the "Signed-off-by" in the first patch as this patch came in vai you and not Robin. Sam -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/