Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 2 Dec 2000 22:32:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 2 Dec 2000 22:32:00 -0500 Received: from TSX-PRIME.MIT.EDU ([18.86.0.76]:44690 "HELO tsx-prime.MIT.EDU") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sat, 2 Dec 2000 22:31:48 -0500 Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2000 22:01:12 -0500 Message-Id: <200012030301.WAA17511@tsx-prime.MIT.EDU> From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" To: Alexander Viro CC: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" , "Albert D. Cahalan" , david@linux.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vpnd@sunsite.auc.dk In-Reply-To: Alexander Viro's message of Sat, 2 Dec 2000 18:34:44 -0500 (EST), Subject: Re: /dev/random probs in 2.4test(12-pre3) Phone: (781) 391-3464 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2000 18:34:44 -0500 (EST) From: Alexander Viro Erm... Not that ignoring the return values was a bright idea, but the lack of reliable ordered datagram protocol in IP family is not a good thing. It can be implemented over TCP, but it's a big overkill. IL is a nice thing to have... You mean RDP (Reliable Data Protocol), RFC-908 and RFC-1151? It provides reliable (i.e., will handle retransmission and dropping duplicate) datagrams with optional sequencing guarantees if requested by the application (but if you don't need sequencing, you don't have to pay for it). It's built on top of IP. It's specified, but it never become popular. But it *is* a member of the IP family, however neglected and ignored it might be. - Ted - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/