DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=beta; d=google.com; c=nofws; q=dns;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:
	cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-system-of-record;
	b=YAs7TPPKY6zML6WGrfF/jwEZoIwiKiCK292rpN00jnTOQ208CEvhUycWUzTbvCuN2
	RIli/U5AYbPQ7HjCSwsWQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20090615085216.GC10822@elf.ucw.cz>
References: <1245033557-10968-1-git-send-email-swetland@google.com>
	 <1245033557-10968-2-git-send-email-swetland@google.com>
	 <20090615085216.GC10822@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 02:55:15 -0700
Message-ID: <a55d774e0906150255h781f7677w9d336257c89200fc@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] [ARM] msm_serial: serial driver for MSM7K onboard 
	serial peripheral.
From: Brian Swetland <swetland@google.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Robert Love <rlove@google.com>,
       Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 920
Lines: 25

On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 1:52 AM, Pavel Machek<pavel@ucw.cz> wrote:
>
> Otherwise seems to be okay (plus the issues someone pointed in other
> email), you can add my acked-by:. I guess you should submit it to
> rmk's patch system...

Russell,

Do you want this stuff to end up in the patch system, or would
accumulating patches into a for-rmk git branch somewhere make sense?
That seemed to work reasonably well last time around.  I'm happy to do
either, but am most comfortable working with git.

Does that even make sense for stuff like the serial driver or should
everything outside of arch/arm/... be going through various different
subsystem maintainers?

Thanks,

Brian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/