Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 6 Mar 2002 11:09:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 6 Mar 2002 11:08:54 -0500 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:17168 "HELO netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 6 Mar 2002 11:08:46 -0500 Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 13:08:23 -0300 (BRT) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@imladris.surriel.com To: Michael Bernstein Cc: Mike Fedyk , Colin Walters , "Jeff V. Merkey" , , Subject: Re: [opensource] Re: Petition Against Official Endorsement of BitKeeper by Linux Maintainers In-Reply-To: <002f01c1c49e$874c3580$1900a8c0@sirius> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, Michael Bernstein wrote: > Rather then griping about the shortcomings of CVS or various other > solutions, wouldn't it be better to create a non-proprietary solution to > the problem? Come back when you've done that. Until then, there is no good alternative to bitkeeper and you're just making yourself look rediculous. regards, Rik -- "Linux holds advantages over the single-vendor commercial OS" -- Microsoft's "Competing with Linux" document http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/