Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764016AbZFORQa (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:16:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1762194AbZFORQP (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:16:15 -0400 Received: from wa4ehsobe005.messaging.microsoft.com ([216.32.181.15]:25101 "EHLO WA4EHSOBE005.bigfish.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752019AbZFORQM (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:16:12 -0400 X-SpamScore: -14 X-BigFish: VPS-14(zz98dR4015Lzz1202hzzz2fh6bh17ch61h) X-Spam-TCS-SCL: 0:0 X-FB-SS: 5, Message-ID: <4A3681C2.5010508@am.sony.com> Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 10:15:46 -0700 From: Tim Bird User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080501) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marco CC: Linux FS Devel , Linux Embedded , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Walker Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] Pramfs: Persistent and protected ram filesystem References: <4A33A7A2.1050608@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4A33A7A2.1050608@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Jun 2009 17:15:48.0281 (UTC) FILETIME=[ED131A90:01C9EDDC] X-SEL-encryption-scan: scanned Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1308 Lines: 35 Marco wrote: > This is a second attempt at mainlining Pramfs. The first attempt was > back in early 2004 by MontaVista. Since then the kernel code has almost > been completely rewritten. So my first item on the list was porting the > code on a recent kernel version. After that I added the XIP support. It's very nice to see this technology revived. Is the information at: http://pramfs.sourceforge.net/ and http://pramfs.sourceforge.net/pramfs-spec.html still valid - particularly the latter? It would be very nice to see this get mainlined. I believe that one of the main uses for this is to store crash information over a reboot so the next kernel (not in crashing state) can have a better chance of dealing with it. As such, I think it's important to keep the code paths for Pramfs short, synchronous, and unentangled with other kernel systems (block IO, page cache, etc.). Thanks, -- Tim ============================= Tim Bird Architecture Group Chair, CE Linux Forum Senior Staff Engineer, Sony Corporation of America ============================= -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/