Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764883AbZFOR65 (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:58:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758562AbZFOR6r (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:58:47 -0400 Received: from outbound-dub.frontbridge.com ([213.199.154.16]:5580 "EHLO IE1EHSOBE006.bigfish.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751428AbZFOR6q (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:58:46 -0400 X-SpamScore: -35 X-BigFish: VPS-35(zz1418M1432R98dR1805M1b0bMzz1202hzzz2fh17ch6bh61h) X-Spam-TCS-SCL: 0:0 Message-ID: <4A368BC8.3010006@am.sony.com> Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 10:58:32 -0700 From: Tim Bird User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080501) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marco CC: Linux FS Devel , Linux Embedded , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Walker Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] Pramfs: Persistent and protected ram filesystem References: <4A33A7A2.1050608@gmail.com> <4A3681C2.5010508@am.sony.com> <4A36887C.1050906@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4A36887C.1050906@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Jun 2009 17:58:33.0281 (UTC) FILETIME=[E5EF0B10:01C9EDE2] X-SEL-encryption-scan: scanned Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2110 Lines: 50 Marco wrote: > Tim Bird wrote: >> Marco wrote: >>> This is a second attempt at mainlining Pramfs. The first attempt was >>> back in early 2004 by MontaVista. Since then the kernel code has almost >>> been completely rewritten. So my first item on the list was porting the >>> code on a recent kernel version. After that I added the XIP support. >> It's very nice to see this technology revived. >> >> Is the information at: >> http://pramfs.sourceforge.net/ >> and >> http://pramfs.sourceforge.net/pramfs-spec.html >> still valid - particularly the latter? > > Yep. at 99%. I've done some modifications due to the porting and there > will be some ones due to this review. I tried to talk with Steve > Longerbeam to update the site but without success. I'd like to update it. > >> It would be very nice to see this get mainlined. I believe that >> one of the main uses for this is to store crash information >> over a reboot so the next kernel (not in crashing state) can have >> a better chance of dealing with it. As such, I think >> it's important to keep the code paths for Pramfs short, synchronous, >> and unentangled with other kernel systems (block IO, page cache, etc.). >> > > Yes, I quite agree. I think that this kind of feature would be very > useful especially for the embedded world. Just FYI - we have an "exception monitor" at Sony which is used in several projects, that records application and kernel crash information into the file system, for subsequent (often in-field) analysis. However, the data currently gets written to a flash filesystem and the logs sometimes get truncated or otherwise corrupted. This seems like a perfect match for what we're trying to do. -- Tim ============================= Tim Bird Architecture Group Chair, CE Linux Forum Senior Staff Engineer, Sony Corporation of America ============================= -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/