Subject: Re: [PATCH] sunrpc: Adding trace points to status routines (take 2)
From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
To: Steve Dickson <SteveD@redhat.com>
Cc: Linux NFS Mailing list <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
       Linux Kernel Mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <4A2EA789.60608@RedHat.com>
References: <4A2EA789.60608@RedHat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:56:51 -0700
Message-Id: <1245113811.7470.15.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 5028
Lines: 184

On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 14:18 -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
> Hey Trond,
> 
> Here is an updated version of the patch I sent out a while
> back... all that has changed was the addtion of 'rpc_'  to
> the name of the trace points which coincides with the
> other trace points naming convention.
> 
> Here is a pointer to the previous email that has the 
> fairly long winded explanation of how all this works:
> 
>    http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124058933520183&w=2
> 
> And below is the updated patch which is based on Ingo's
> linux-2.6-tip.git tree. 
> 
> Comments?
> 
> steved.
>  
> Author: Steve Dickson <steved@redhat.com>
> Date:   Tue Jun  9 14:12:07 EDT 2009
> 
>     Adds three trace points to the status routines in the
>     sunrpc state machine. The trace points will only execute
>     in error conditions.
>     
>     The goal of these trace points it to make it easier to
>     debug process that spin or get hung up in the NFS and
>     related subsystems.

Would this replace the existing dprint_status()? How does it differ from
the existing DYNAMIC_DEBUG functionality that was merged in 2.6.30?
    
>     Signed-off-by: Steve Dickson <steved@redhat.com>
> 
> diff --git a/include/trace/events/sunrpc.h b/include/trace/events/sunrpc.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..f502eb4
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/trace/events/sunrpc.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
> +#if !defined(_TRACE_SUNRPC_H) || defined(TRACE_HEADER_MULTI_READ)
> +#define _TRACE_SUNRPC_H
> +
> +#include <linux/tracepoint.h>
> +
> +#undef TRACE_SYSTEM
> +#define TRACE_SYSTEM sunrpc
> +
> +TRACE_EVENT(rpc_call_status,
> +
> +	TP_PROTO(struct rpc_task *task),
> +
> +	TP_ARGS(task),
> +
> +	TP_STRUCT__entry(
> +		__field(u32, cl_prog)
> +		__field(u32, cl_vers)
> +		__field(u32, p_proc)
> +		__field(int, tk_status)
> +	),
> +
> +	TP_fast_assign(
> +		__entry->cl_prog = task->tk_client->cl_prog;
> +		__entry->cl_vers = task->tk_client->cl_vers;
> +		__entry->p_proc = task->tk_client->cl_procinfo->p_proc;
> +		__entry->cl_prog = task->tk_client->cl_prog;

You should only need to set entry->cl_prog once, right?

> +		__entry->tk_status = task->tk_status;
> +	),
> +
> +	TP_printk("%d[%d]:%d status=%d", __entry->cl_prog, 
> +		__entry->cl_vers,__entry->p_proc, __entry->tk_status)
> +);
> +
> +TRACE_EVENT(rpc_bind_status,
> +
> +	TP_PROTO(struct rpc_task *task),
> +
> +	TP_ARGS(task),
> +
> +	TP_STRUCT__entry(
> +		__field(u32, cl_prog)
> +		__field(u32, cl_vers)
> +		__field(u32, p_proc)
> +		__field(int, tk_status)
> +	),
> +
> +	TP_fast_assign(
> +		__entry->cl_prog = task->tk_client->cl_prog;
> +		__entry->cl_vers = task->tk_client->cl_vers;
> +		__entry->p_proc = task->tk_client->cl_procinfo->p_proc;
> +		__entry->cl_prog = task->tk_client->cl_prog;

Ditto

> +		__entry->tk_status = task->tk_status;
> +	),
> +
> +	TP_printk("%d[%d]:%d status=%d", __entry->cl_prog, 
> +		__entry->cl_vers,__entry->p_proc, __entry->tk_status)
> +);
> +TRACE_EVENT(rpc_connect_status,
> +
> +	TP_PROTO(struct rpc_task *task, int status),
> +
> +	TP_ARGS(task, status),
> +
> +	TP_STRUCT__entry(
> +		__field(u32, cl_prog)
> +		__field(u32, cl_vers)
> +		__field(u32, p_proc)
> +		__field(int, tk_status)
> +	),
> +
> +	TP_fast_assign(
> +		__entry->cl_prog = task->tk_client->cl_prog;
> +		__entry->cl_vers = task->tk_client->cl_vers;
> +		__entry->p_proc = task->tk_client->cl_procinfo->p_proc;
> +		__entry->cl_prog = task->tk_client->cl_prog;

Ditto

> +		__entry->tk_status = status;
> +	),
> +
> +	TP_printk("%d[%d]:%d status=%d", __entry->cl_prog, 
> +		__entry->cl_vers,__entry->p_proc, __entry->tk_status)
> +
> +);
> +#endif /* __TRACE_SUNRPC_H */
> +
> +/* This part must be outside protection */
> +#include <trace/define_trace.h>
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/clnt.c b/net/sunrpc/clnt.c
> index 5abab09..b86ee2a 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/clnt.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/clnt.c
> @@ -37,6 +37,9 @@
>  #include <linux/sunrpc/rpc_pipe_fs.h>
>  #include <linux/sunrpc/metrics.h>
>  
> +#include <linux/ftrace.h>
> +#define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
> +#include <trace/events/sunrpc.h>
>  
>  #ifdef RPC_DEBUG
>  # define RPCDBG_FACILITY	RPCDBG_CALL
> @@ -957,6 +960,7 @@ call_bind_status(struct rpc_task *task)
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> +	trace_rpc_bind_status(task);
>  	switch (task->tk_status) {
>  	case -ENOMEM:
>  		dprintk("RPC: %5u rpcbind out of memory\n", task->tk_pid);
> @@ -1038,6 +1042,7 @@ call_connect_status(struct rpc_task *task)
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> +	trace_rpc_connect_status(task, status);
>  	switch (status) {
>  		/* if soft mounted, test if we've timed out */
>  	case -ETIMEDOUT:
> @@ -1141,6 +1146,7 @@ call_status(struct rpc_task *task)
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> +	trace_rpc_call_status(task);
>  	task->tk_status = 0;
>  	switch(status) {
>  	case -EHOSTDOWN:
> 
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/