Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 6 Mar 2002 15:09:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 6 Mar 2002 15:09:32 -0500 Received: from x35.xmailserver.org ([208.129.208.51]:8197 "EHLO x35.xmailserver.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 6 Mar 2002 15:09:22 -0500 X-AuthUser: davidel@xmailserver.org Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 12:12:54 -0800 (PST) From: Davide Libenzi X-X-Sender: davide@blue1.dev.mcafeelabs.com To: Colin Walters cc: Rik van Riel , , Subject: Re: [opensource] Re: Petition Against Official Endorsement of BitKeeper by Linux Maintainers In-Reply-To: <1015444003.18074.7.camel@space-ghost> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 6 Mar 2002, Colin Walters wrote: > That being said, I personally will probably start getting more involved > with arch. Hacking on a verison control system looks like fun. It is fun. I would not be surprised if after all this noise a XCVS project would start. I understand what the goal of your petition was guys, but you've to understand that there're a lot of developers for which Linux kernel hacking turned to be from fun to work ( and fun, or better payed fun ). And you cannot blame someone that uses the better tool ( for them ) to accomplish the job. If CVS would have done the job i think it would have been employed a long time ago as long as i think that if an XCVS will be available in a next future it will be probably used in this context. - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/