Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759612AbZFPQWJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Jun 2009 12:22:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757534AbZFPQV5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Jun 2009 12:21:57 -0400 Received: from mail-bw0-f213.google.com ([209.85.218.213]:59156 "EHLO mail-bw0-f213.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756949AbZFPQV5 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Jun 2009 12:21:57 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=sH2/04o/hiEXW7wfR7czHzeLRxw8b1ikoLNMQyEHjjrxcivUTFs/L58Y7IoZgiBOJP +AzRhzelJ9WhRkuS5eK+XMWvFFl5naFI+Ksq1R0mG4Ka3WqNsMbKMh4YGTDsar4NzNhG xb4I9c+Mu498RLd0pQ3F022bjdw7v0L0m/e2E= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20090615145933.GA26856@damson.getinternet.no> References: <20090615145933.GA26856@damson.getinternet.no> Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 19:21:57 +0300 X-Google-Sender-Auth: e9d94a6a5a76270e Message-ID: <84144f020906160921s234b0095k654c75e2e6bfe6dd@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] kmemcheck for mainline From: Pekka Enberg To: Vegard Nossum Cc: Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1120 Lines: 23 On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Vegard Nossum wrote: > I redid the tree by rebasing. I've backported and incorporated fixes except > in the (few) cases where multiple authors were involved, in order to preserve > authorship information. I rebased against the same version that the previous > pull request was merged to; this allows us to easily view the difference > between the two pull requests (minus the top commit, which is a merge with > your latest tree): > > ?$ git diff kmemcheck/for-linus..kmemcheck/for-linus2^ > > and account for any discrepancies (see the bottom of this e-mail). I've > tested the new tree on x86 and x86_64 with and without kmemcheck. Looks good to me. Ingo, if Linus doesn't pull this for -rc1, I think you should nuke the kmemcheck branch in -tip and use this instead, right? Pekka -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/