Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761563AbZFPTZ5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Jun 2009 15:25:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755101AbZFPTZs (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Jun 2009 15:25:48 -0400 Received: from outbound-mail-25.bluehost.com ([69.89.21.20]:37208 "HELO outbound-mail-25.bluehost.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1754578AbZFPTZs (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Jun 2009 15:25:48 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=virtuousgeek.org; h=Received:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Identified-User; b=bYbqjFZXTX+7KsVn6HbyTEMejr6v+8wHzbxrr2xZyjXeXJnUHxApxmM3PFQS4zDEw1CRiSImFHutjhv/LJsHVePOLjYcd0i8hbsxDt5ZaaFTAdxS8UPPADd+6EBjQgMn; Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 12:25:47 -0700 From: Jesse Barnes To: Martin Knoblauch Cc: Kay Sievers , Andrew Morton , efault@gmx.de, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, rjw@sisk.pl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, shemminger@vyatta.com, matthew@wil.cx, mike.miller@hp.com Subject: Re: Analyzed/Solved/Bisected: Booting 2.6.30-rc2-git7 very slow Message-ID: <20090616122547.1323d2d4@jbarnes-g45> In-Reply-To: <170150.72851.qm@web32604.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <488605.71443.qm@web32605.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20090527133125.c36381b5.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <170150.72851.qm@web32604.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.1 (GTK+ 2.16.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Identified-User: {10642:box514.bluehost.com:virtuous:virtuousgeek.org} {sentby:smtp auth 75.111.28.251 authed with jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org} Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1292 Lines: 30 On Thu, 28 May 2009 02:14:46 -0700 (PDT) Martin Knoblauch wrote: > > I expect the duplicate comes from a left-over mount in initramfs > > which isn't a duplicate in the sense of a bug in vfs or mount or > > anything. I guess, it is just still mounted in the initial kernel > > rootfs, below the root from the disk. It could be that a umount > > from initramfs did go wrong because of a changed timing. > > > > This is what I suspect as well. I know for sure that the first > sysfs-line in /proc/mounts > > | none /sys sysfs rw 0 0 > > is already there (2.6.29-rc1 and up) when entering startup-skripts. > It is supposed to be unmounted before, but something seems to prevent > it. I have idea how to capture debug output from the initrd/init > script :-( What's the latest here Martin? It sounded like this was a userspace issue, with something reading the VPD over and over? Or was it just a longer timeout that caused a specific driver to slow everything down? -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/