Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S293731AbSCFVAa>; Wed, 6 Mar 2002 16:00:30 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S310163AbSCFVAF>; Wed, 6 Mar 2002 16:00:05 -0500
Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:25997 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S293731AbSCFU7z>;
	Wed, 6 Mar 2002 15:59:55 -0500
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2002 12:57:33 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <20020306.125733.10131281.davem@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
CC: opensource@cis.ohio-state.edu
Subject: Re: [opensource] Re: Petition Against Official Endorsement of
 BitKeeper by Linux Maintainers
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L.0203061300500.2181-100000@imladris.surriel.com>
In-Reply-To: <1015368059.25841.12.camel@space-ghost>
	<Pine.LNX.4.44L.0203061300500.2181-100000@imladris.surriel.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


Probably the most amusing consequence of this "petition" is that it
has given BitKeeper a lot of extra free publicity. :-)

In fact more than I've ever given it publicly, and that is the most
ironic and hilarious part.  ROFL.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/