Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 6 Mar 2002 16:06:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 6 Mar 2002 16:06:05 -0500 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:46347 "HELO netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 6 Mar 2002 16:05:50 -0500 Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 17:24:12 -0300 (BRT) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@imladris.surriel.com To: Davide Libenzi Cc: Colin Walters , , Subject: Re: [opensource] Re: Petition Against Official Endorsement of BitKeeper by Linux Maintainers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 6 Mar 2002, Davide Libenzi wrote: > On 6 Mar 2002, Colin Walters wrote: > > > That being said, I personally will probably start getting more involved > > with arch. Hacking on a verison control system looks like fun. > > It is fun. I would not be surprised if after all this noise a XCVS project > would start. I understand what the goal of your petition was guys, but > [snip] ... you cannot blame someone that uses the better tool Bitkeeper has raised the bar, I hope the free version control folks will do their best trying to jump to the new level ;) regards, Rik -- "Linux holds advantages over the single-vendor commercial OS" -- Microsoft's "Competing with Linux" document http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/