Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1765573AbZFQM3a (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Jun 2009 08:29:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933278AbZFQM26 (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Jun 2009 08:28:58 -0400 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:36966 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1765687AbZFQM25 (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Jun 2009 08:28:57 -0400 Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:23:52 +0200 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Stanislaw Gruszka Cc: Andrew Morton , Peter Zijlstra , Roland McGrath , Vitaly Mayatskikh , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] wait_task_zombie: do not use thread_group_cputime() Message-ID: <20090617122352.GA4611@redhat.com> References: <20090615212651.GA22759@redhat.com> <20090617101354.4100a910@dhcp-lab-109.englab.brq.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090617101354.4100a910@dhcp-lab-109.englab.brq.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1423 Lines: 40 On 06/17, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > > On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 23:26:51 +0200 > Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > > There is no reason for thread_group_cputime() in wait_task_zombie(), > > there must be no other threads. > > > > This call was previously needed to collect the per-cpu data which > > we do not have any longer. > > Is similar change for posix_cpu_timers_exit_group() correct and worthwhile ? > > void posix_cpu_timers_exit_group(struct task_struct *tsk) > { > - struct task_cputime cputime; > + struct signal_struct *const sig = tsk->signal; > > - thread_group_cputimer(tsk, &cputime); > cleanup_timers(tsk->signal->cpu_timers, > - cputime.utime, cputime.stime, cputime.sum_exec_runtime); > + cputime_add(tsk->utime, sig->utime), > + cputime_add(tsk->stime, sig->stime), > + tsk->se.sum_exec_runtime + sig->sum_sched_runtime); > } Yes, I think you are right. And I think thread_group_cputimer() was never needed, it should be thread_group_cputime(). Which in turn is not needed any longer too. Please re-send with changelog/subject ? Oleg. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/