Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 6 Mar 2002 19:13:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 6 Mar 2002 19:13:04 -0500 Received: from dsl-213-023-043-059.arcor-ip.net ([213.23.43.59]:60587 "EHLO starship.berlin") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 6 Mar 2002 19:12:51 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [RFC] Arch option to touch newly allocated pages Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 01:08:40 +0100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <3C84F449.8090404@zytor.com> <3C86A765.2000301@zytor.com> In-Reply-To: <3C86A765.2000301@zytor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On March 7, 2002 12:33 am, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Daniel Phillips wrote: > > > Instead of providing constructive suggestions on how to solve the problem so that > > memory overcommit works properly in this case, I see people telling Jeff there is > > no problem. I think Jeff has a little more of a clue than that. > > Jeff has clue, but you, Daniel, quite frankly could take a cue. You nseem > to be jumping into arguments just for the sake of them, but without ever > contribute anything useful. The useful contribution is to stop you and Ben from beating up on Jeff. Thankyou, I think I've accomplished that purpose. Feel free to attack me for that if you feel the need. (objectionable comment removed) -- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/