Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 6 Mar 2002 19:23:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 6 Mar 2002 19:22:54 -0500 Received: from brooklyn-bridge.emea.veritas.com ([62.172.234.2]:61205 "EHLO einstein.homenet") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 6 Mar 2002 19:22:41 -0500 Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 00:26:18 +0000 (GMT) From: Tigran Aivazian X-X-Sender: To: Subject: Re: chroot_fs_refs and pivot_root question In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Tigran Aivazian wrote: > Amazing that nobody knew the answer but I think I understand now the > reason, the /proc/1/cwd and /proc/1/root point to "/" and the comment > above sys_pivot_root says: > > * Note: > * - we don't move root/cwd if they are not at the root (reason: if > something > * cared enough to change them, it's probably wrong to force them > elsewhere) > > So, that is why the /sbin/init wasn't moved, because it's root/cwd were at ~~~~~~ I often say "yes" instead of "no" (and other way around) :) It obviously _was_ moved and the problem is that it's executable's mapping and the libc/ld mappings are keeping /sysroot busy... > /initrd so when it got pivoted to / (and / put to /sysroot) the init was > left alone. Well, either the above policy is wrong or I need to figure out > a way to convince init to move peacebly where I want it to... :) > > On Wed, 6 Mar 2002, Tigran Aivazian wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > Looking at (2.4.9's) sys_pivot_root() implementation I can see that it > > moves all the processes' root/pwd references from the old root to the new > > one. > > > > However, somehow /sbin/init managed to survive the move and is keeping the > > filesystem busy: > > > > # lsof /sysroot > > COMMAND PID USER FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE NODE NAME > > init 1 0 txt REG 22,65 28220 11217 /sysroot/sbin/init > > init 1 0 mem REG 22,65 468849 10376 > > /sysroot/lib/ld-2.2.2.so > > init 1 0 mem REG 22,65 5636080 10370 > > /sysroot/lib/i686/libc-2.2.2.so > > > > # cat /proc/1/maps > > 08048000-0804f000 r-xp 00000000 16:41 11217 /sysroot/sbin/init > > 0804f000-08050000 rw-p 00006000 16:41 11217 /sysroot/sbin/init > > 08050000-08054000 rwxp 00000000 00:00 0 > > 15556000-1556c000 r-xp 00000000 16:41 10376 /sysroot/lib/ld-2.2.2.so > > 1556c000-1556d000 rw-p 00015000 16:41 10376 /sysroot/lib/ld-2.2.2.so > > 1556d000-1556e000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0 > > 15573000-15699000 r-xp 00000000 16:41 10370 /sysroot/lib/i686/libc-2.2.2.so > > 15699000-1569f000 rw-p 00125000 16:41 10370 /sysroot/lib/i686/libc-2.2.2.so > > 1569f000-156a3000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0 > > 3fffe000-40000000 rwxp fffff000 00:00 0 > > > > Any clues why and how to force it to exec a binary on the new root (or > > get rid of it in any other way)? > > > > Regards, > > Tigran > > > > > > > > > > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/