Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley
	Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United
	Kingdom.
	Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20090617074711.GZ13073@webber.adilger.int>
References: <20090617074711.GZ13073@webber.adilger.int> <20090616203845.4526.60013.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <20090616203901.4526.200.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@sun.com>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org,
       linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Wang Lei <wang840925@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/17] VFS: Implement handling for pathless pioctls
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:26:37 +0100
Message-ID: <28511.1245263197@redhat.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 828
Lines: 20

Andreas Dilger <adilger@sun.com> wrote:

> Wouldn't it make a lot more sense to create a virtual device, open the
> mountpoint, or do _something_ that associates these calls with AFS
> directly instead of having the kernel magically route the call to a
> specific filesystem?

Ummm...  You mean like mkdir, rmdir, symlink, readlink, mknod, creat, open,
unlink, etc. aren't magically routed by the kernel to a specific filesystem
based on the pathname?

The exception to that is pathless pioctls which are most annoying and require
special handling and foreknowledge whatever.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/