Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 6 Mar 2002 20:35:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 6 Mar 2002 20:35:05 -0500 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:35087 "HELO netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 6 Mar 2002 20:34:59 -0500 Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 22:34:46 -0300 (BRT) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@imladris.surriel.com To: David Schwartz Cc: bernstein.46@osu.edu, Mike Fedyk , Colin Walters , "Jeff V. Merkey" , , Subject: Re: [opensource] Re: Petition Against Official Endorsement of BitKeeper by Linux Maintainers In-Reply-To: <20020307012747.AAA20283@shell.webmaster.com@whenever> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 6 Mar 2002, David Schwartz wrote: > On Tue, 5 Mar 2002 18:36:08 -0500, Michael Bernstein wrote: > > >However, when a whole movement based > >on the idea of creating non-proprietary software decides to utilize > >proprietary software in order to better create free software, I feel that > >there is some hypocrisy going on. > > What?! It's really this simple, you use the best tool for the job. > Why can't we advocate the tools that really do work best. I'm in it for quality software, not specifically for the ideology of free software. > Why do we have to be a movement based upon an inflexible ideology? Not to mention, why should we have to conform to the ideology of the "free software" crowd ? cheers, Rik -- http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/