Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 6 Mar 2002 21:25:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 6 Mar 2002 21:25:24 -0500 Received: from 1Cust22.tnt15.sfo3.da.uu.net ([67.218.75.22]:18694 "EHLO morrowfield.home") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 6 Mar 2002 21:25:18 -0500 Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 06:25:12 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200203071425.GAA06679@morrowfield.home> From: Tom Lord To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org cc: davej@suse.de Subject: Why not an arch mirror for the kernel? Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org While I won't take a position on the petition, the post quoted below has some practical implications, and some others have been raised that I'll answer: Dave Jones observes: Something I've not yet worked out is why none of the proponents of arch, subversion etc are offering to run a mirror of Linus' bitkeeper tree for those who don't want to use bk, but "must have 0-day kernels". In my case (I'm the author arch) it's entirely a resource problem. I simply can't afford it at the moment. Otherwise, it would likely be a high priority. Let me share some news for people who might be interested in alternatives to BK: At least one kernel contributor has a private arch repository for kernel work, so it seems to be at least marginally doable. I am certain that further testing, performance improvements, better documentation, and some touch-ups to existing functionality are necessary before I would say "arch is so good that you have no excuse for not using it for kernel work." Nevertheless, it's interesting that someone is already experimenting with it and the kernel. I am working on some tools that will help to implement automatic, incremental, bidirectional gateways between arch, Subversion, and Bk. I've written a document that describes the state of arch and the options that I think exist for getting from its current state to a state where it is unambiguously the best choice. See: http://www.regexps.com/survey.html I would like to hear (off-list) from people who are interested in eventually using arch for kernel work, but who aren't yet "early adopters". What milestones or features are needed, in your opinion? Please be sure to mention in your email if I may quote you or not (the default presumption will be that I may not, though I may anonymously paraphrase interesting messages and report aggregate results.) Thanks, -t - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/