Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 6 Mar 2002 21:35:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 6 Mar 2002 21:35:23 -0500 Received: from ns0.auctionwatch.com ([66.7.130.2]:24331 "EHLO whitestar.auctionwatch.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 6 Mar 2002 21:35:17 -0500 Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 18:35:16 -0800 From: Petro Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [opensource] Re: Petition Against Official Endorsement of BitKeeper by Linux Maintainers Message-ID: <20020307023516.GH32504@auctionwatch.com> In-Reply-To: <20020305165233.A28212@fireball.zosima.org> <20020305154147.A6211@vger.timpanogas.org> <1015368059.25841.12.camel@space-ghost> <20020305230143.GB5538@matchmail.com> <20020306154604.B21655@mark.mielke.cc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020306154604.B21655@mark.mielke.cc> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)@localhost.localdomain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 03:46:04PM -0500, Mark Mielke wrote: > On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 03:14:19PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > Followup to: <20020305230143.GB5538@matchmail.com> > If BK meets all the requirements, and no other product does, then don't > give it a second thought, or a second post. I don't know what BK offers, We used to use it here, and it rocked. We just couldn't afford to use it any more, and that sucked. CVS is a piss poor alternative. I miss bitkeeper, and I didn't even use it all that heavily. -- Share and Enjoy. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/