Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 6 Mar 2002 23:58:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 6 Mar 2002 23:57:53 -0500 Received: from altus.drgw.net ([209.234.73.40]:24330 "EHLO altus.drgw.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 6 Mar 2002 23:57:41 -0500 Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 22:56:52 -0600 From: Troy Benjegerdes To: Larry McVoy , Tom Lord , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davej@suse.de Subject: Re: Why not an arch mirror for the kernel? Message-ID: <20020306225652.Q1682@altus.drgw.net> In-Reply-To: <200203071425.GAA06679@morrowfield.home> <20020306190419.E31751@work.bitmover.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20020306190419.E31751@work.bitmover.com>; from lm@bitmover.com on Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 07:04:19PM -0800 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > I am working on some tools that will help to implement automatic, > > incremental, bidirectional gateways between arch, Subversion, and Bk. > > Gateways, yes, bidirectional, no. Arch doesn't begin to maintain > the metadata which BK maintains, so it can't begin to solve the > same problems. If you have a bidirectional gateway, you reduce BK > to the level of arch or subversion, in which case, why use BK at all? > If CVS/Arch/Subversion/whatever works for you, I'd say just use it and > leave BK out of it. Okay Larry, reality check here... We really *DO* need to have more than one source control system available for people to use. So maybe Arch and Subversion don't maintain all the metadata BK maintains. That just means that the $OTHER_SCM->BK gateway process has some manual involvement. This is no different conceptually than sending a 'plain old patch' in email to $MAINTAINER. It is in everyone's best interest to make a functional *bidirectional* BK<->Arch gateway. (Including you Larry) This keeps the all the open source zealots quiet, and reduces the support load of Bitmover to those people that actually *want* to use Larry's stuff because it's better, not those that use it now because there is no '90%' alternative. I'd love to see Larry and Tom sit down in a room and come up with an *easy* way for $MAINTAINER to take patches from both Arch and BK. (I have only left Subversion out because I haven't seen anyone from the project take an interest in making changes for kernel developers) Now, obviously, my time would have been a lot better spent actually working on this myself, but I have deadlines, and wouldn't have time to finish it right now. So, I'm trying to spread some sanity around in the hopes it is contagious. (doubtfull, but I suppose I'll try) -- Troy Benjegerdes | master of mispeeling | 'da hozer' | hozer@drgw.net -----"If this message isn't misspelled, I didn't write it" -- Me ----- "Why do musicians compose symphonies and poets write poems? They do it because life wouldn't have any meaning for them if they didn't. That's why I draw cartoons. It's my life." -- Charles Schulz - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/