Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763005AbZFRLvj (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Jun 2009 07:51:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1762319AbZFRLvU (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Jun 2009 07:51:20 -0400 Received: from mail.parknet.ad.jp ([210.171.162.6]:59503 "EHLO mail.officemail.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1762136AbZFRLvS (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Jun 2009 07:51:18 -0400 From: OGAWA Hirofumi To: Jan Kara Cc: LKML , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, npiggin@suse.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/11] vfs: Unmap underlying metadata of new data buffers only when buffer is mapped References: <1245088797-29533-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz> <1245088797-29533-8-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz> Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 20:51:13 +0900 In-Reply-To: <1245088797-29533-8-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz> (Jan Kara's message of "Mon, 15 Jun 2009 19:59:54 +0200") Message-ID: <87hbydkbf2.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.94 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Anti-Virus: Kaspersky Anti-Virus for MailServers 5.5.10/RELEASE, bases: 24052007 #308098, status: clean Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1424 Lines: 40 Jan Kara writes: > When we do delayed allocation of some buffer, we want to signal to VFS that > the buffer is new (set buffer_new) so that it properly zeros out everything. > But we don't have the buffer mapped yet so we cannot really unmap underlying > metadata in this state. Make VFS avoid doing unmapping of metadata when the > buffer is not yet mapped. I may be missing something. However, isn't the delalloc buffer == (buffer_mapped() | buffer_delay())? Well, anyway, if buffer is not buffer_mapped(), e.g. truncate() works properly? Thanks. > diff --git a/fs/buffer.c b/fs/buffer.c > index 80e2630..7eb1710 100644 > --- a/fs/buffer.c > +++ b/fs/buffer.c > @@ -1683,8 +1683,9 @@ static int __block_write_full_page(struct inode *inode, struct page *page, > if (buffer_new(bh)) { > /* blockdev mappings never come here */ > clear_buffer_new(bh); > - unmap_underlying_metadata(bh->b_bdev, > - bh->b_blocknr); > + if (buffer_mapped(bh)) > + unmap_underlying_metadata(bh->b_bdev, > + bh->b_blocknr); Is this needed for writepage? > } > } > bh = bh->b_this_page; -- OGAWA Hirofumi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/