Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 7 Mar 2002 03:23:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 7 Mar 2002 03:23:36 -0500 Received: from stargazer.compendium-tech.com ([64.156.208.76]:30389 "EHLO stargazer.compendium-tech.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 7 Mar 2002 03:23:20 -0500 Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 00:21:16 -0800 (PST) From: Kelsey Hudson To: "LA Walsh @ tlinx.org" cc: J Sloan , janvapan , Subject: RE: Recommendations about a 100/10 NIC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 3 Mar 2002, LA Walsh @ tlinx.org wrote: > Any recommendations for the most Linux-friendly/best performance, > 2-ethernet port cards? Is there a website one could go to find Linux > Compatible and Linux-ease-of-use hardware and software products? Comparisons? > Etc? Linda, I've got a dual port Intel eepro100 card in this machine. I've had it close to a year, with nothing but excellent performance and stability. I can't say the same thing for other cards i've tried in here, namingly the 3com adapters everyone seems to think are so great. I won't even touch a 3com adapter anymore, but i digress... These dual eepro100 cards can be had used for relatively cheap; i think I purchased this one for $45USD when i bought it... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/