Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756187AbZFSFvS (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Jun 2009 01:51:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751653AbZFSFvI (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Jun 2009 01:51:08 -0400 Received: from out02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.232]:39758 "EHLO out02.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751279AbZFSFvH (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Jun 2009 01:51:07 -0400 To: Yinghai Lu Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge , Len Brown , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , "the arch\/x86 maintainers" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Xen-devel References: <4A329CF8.4050502@goop.org> <4A3A9220.4070807@goop.org> <4A3A99FB.7070807@goop.org> <4A3AC0C4.6060508@goop.org> <86802c440906182232r31088e4fh3613a8da6f8903f7@mail.gmail.com> From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 22:50:59 -0700 In-Reply-To: <86802c440906182232r31088e4fh3613a8da6f8903f7@mail.gmail.com> (Yinghai Lu's message of "Thu\, 18 Jun 2009 22\:32\:59 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-XM-SPF: eid=;;;mid=;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=76.21.114.89;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 76.21.114.89 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: yhlu.kernel@gmail.com, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, lenb@kernel.org, jeremy@goop.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa01 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ;Yinghai Lu X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Report: * -1.8 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG * -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa01 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 0.0 T_TooManySym_01 4+ unique symbols in subject * 0.0 XM_SPF_Neutral SPF-Neutral * 0.4 UNTRUSTED_Relay Comes from a non-trusted relay Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] x86/acpi: don't ignore I/O APICs just because there's no local APIC X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 25 Oct 2007 00:26:12 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 389 Lines: 12 Yinghai Lu writes: > doesn't XEN support per cpu irq vector? Nope. It doesn't even support the notion of cpus. Eric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/