From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org,
       dm-devel@redhat.com, jens.axboe@oracle.com, nauman@google.com,
       dpshah@google.com, lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, mikew@google.com,
       fchecconi@gmail.com, paolo.valente@unimore.it, ryov@valinux.co.jp,
       fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp, s-uchida@ap.jp.nec.com, taka@valinux.co.jp,
       guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com, jmoyer@redhat.com,
       dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com, balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
       righi.andrea@gmail.com, m-ikeda@ds.jp.nec.com, jbaron@redhat.com
Cc: agk@redhat.com, snitzer@redhat.com, vgoyal@redhat.com,
       akpm@linux-foundation.org, peterz@infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 03/20] io-controller: Charge for time slice based on average disk rate
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 16:37:21 -0400
Message-Id: <1245443858-8487-4-git-send-email-vgoyal@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <1245443858-8487-1-git-send-email-vgoyal@redhat.com>
References: <1245443858-8487-1-git-send-email-vgoyal@redhat.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 7005
Lines: 209

o There are situations where a queue gets expired very soon and it looks
  as if time slice used by that queue is zero. For example, If an async
  queue dispatches a bunch of requests and queue is expired before first
  request completes. Another example is where a queue is expired as soon
  as first request completes and queue has no more requests (sync queues
  on SSD).

o Currently we just charge 25% of slice length in such cases. This patch tries
  to improve on that approximation by keeping a track of average disk rate
  and charging for time by nr_sectors/disk_rate.

o This is still experimental, not very sure if it gives measurable improvement
  or not.

Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
---
 block/elevator-fq.c |   85 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 block/elevator-fq.h |   11 ++++++
 2 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/elevator-fq.c b/block/elevator-fq.c
index 9357fb0..3e956dc 100644
--- a/block/elevator-fq.c
+++ b/block/elevator-fq.c
@@ -21,6 +21,9 @@ const int elv_slice_async_rq = 2;
 int elv_slice_idle = HZ / 125;
 static struct kmem_cache *elv_ioq_pool;
 
+/* Maximum Window length for updating average disk rate */
+static int elv_rate_sampling_window = HZ / 10;
+
 #define ELV_SLICE_SCALE		(5)
 #define ELV_HW_QUEUE_MIN	(5)
 #define IO_SERVICE_TREE_INIT   ((struct io_service_tree)		\
@@ -961,6 +964,47 @@ static void elv_ioq_update_io_thinktime(struct io_queue *ioq)
 	ioq->ttime_mean = (ioq->ttime_total + 128) / ioq->ttime_samples;
 }
 
+static void elv_update_io_rate(struct elv_fq_data *efqd, struct request *rq)
+{
+	long elapsed = jiffies - efqd->rate_sampling_start;
+	unsigned long total;
+
+	/* sampling window is off */
+	if (!efqd->rate_sampling_start)
+		return;
+
+	efqd->rate_sectors_current += rq->nr_sectors;
+
+	if (efqd->rq_in_driver && (elapsed < elv_rate_sampling_window))
+		return;
+
+	efqd->rate_sectors = (7*efqd->rate_sectors +
+				256*efqd->rate_sectors_current) / 8;
+
+	if (!elapsed) {
+		/*
+		 * updating rate before a jiffy could complete. Could be a
+		 * problem with fast queuing/non-queuing hardware. Should we
+		 * look at higher resolution time source?
+		 *
+		 * In case of non-queuing hardware we will probably not try to
+		 * dispatch from multiple queues and will be able to account
+		 * for disk time used and will not need this approximation
+		 * anyway?
+		 */
+		elapsed = 1;
+	}
+
+	efqd->rate_time = (7*efqd->rate_time + 256*elapsed) / 8;
+	total = efqd->rate_sectors + (efqd->rate_time/2);
+	efqd->mean_rate = total/efqd->rate_time;
+
+	elv_log(efqd, "mean_rate=%d, t=%d s=%d", efqd->mean_rate,
+			elapsed, efqd->rate_sectors_current);
+	efqd->rate_sampling_start = 0;
+	efqd->rate_sectors_current = 0;
+}
+
 /*
  * Disable idle window if the process thinks too long.
  * This idle flag can also be updated by io scheduler.
@@ -1252,6 +1296,34 @@ void elv_del_ioq_busy(struct elevator_queue *e, struct io_queue *ioq,
 }
 
 /*
+ * Calculate the effective disk time used by the queue based on how many
+ * sectors queue has dispatched and what is the average disk rate
+ * Returns disk time in ms.
+ */
+static inline unsigned long elv_disk_time_used(struct request_queue *q,
+					struct io_queue *ioq)
+{
+	struct elv_fq_data *efqd = &q->elevator->efqd;
+	struct io_entity *entity = &ioq->entity;
+	unsigned long jiffies_used = 0;
+
+	if (!efqd->mean_rate)
+		return entity->budget/4;
+
+	/* Charge the queue based on average disk rate */
+	jiffies_used = ioq->nr_sectors/efqd->mean_rate;
+
+	if (!jiffies_used)
+		jiffies_used = 1;
+
+	elv_log_ioq(efqd, ioq, "disk time=%ldms sect=%lu rate=%ld",
+				jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies_used),
+				ioq->nr_sectors, efqd->mean_rate);
+
+	return jiffies_used;
+}
+
+/*
  * Do the accounting. Determine how much service (in terms of time slices)
  * current queue used and adjust the start, finish time of queue and vtime
  * of the tree accordingly.
@@ -1303,7 +1375,7 @@ void __elv_ioq_slice_expired(struct request_queue *q, struct io_queue *ioq)
 	 * the requests to finish. But this will reduce throughput.
 	 */
 	if (!ioq->slice_end)
-		slice_used = entity->budget/4;
+		slice_used = elv_disk_time_used(q, ioq);
 	else {
 		if (time_after(ioq->slice_end, jiffies)) {
 			slice_unused = ioq->slice_end - jiffies;
@@ -1313,7 +1385,7 @@ void __elv_ioq_slice_expired(struct request_queue *q, struct io_queue *ioq)
 				 * completing first request. Charge 25% of
 				 * slice.
 				 */
-				slice_used = entity->budget/4;
+				slice_used = elv_disk_time_used(q, ioq);
 			} else
 				slice_used = entity->budget - slice_unused;
 		} else {
@@ -1331,6 +1403,8 @@ void __elv_ioq_slice_expired(struct request_queue *q, struct io_queue *ioq)
 	BUG_ON(ioq != efqd->active_queue);
 	elv_reset_active_ioq(efqd);
 
+	/* Queue is being expired. Reset number of secotrs dispatched */
+	ioq->nr_sectors = 0;
 	if (!ioq->nr_queued)
 		elv_del_ioq_busy(q->elevator, ioq, 1);
 	else
@@ -1664,6 +1738,7 @@ void elv_fq_dispatched_request(struct elevator_queue *e, struct request *rq)
 
 	BUG_ON(!ioq);
 	elv_ioq_request_dispatched(ioq);
+	ioq->nr_sectors += rq->nr_sectors;
 	elv_ioq_request_removed(e, rq);
 	elv_clear_ioq_must_dispatch(ioq);
 }
@@ -1676,6 +1751,10 @@ void elv_fq_activate_rq(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq)
 		return;
 
 	efqd->rq_in_driver++;
+
+	if (!efqd->rate_sampling_start)
+		efqd->rate_sampling_start = jiffies;
+
 	elv_log_ioq(efqd, rq_ioq(rq), "activate rq, drv=%d",
 						efqd->rq_in_driver);
 }
@@ -1767,6 +1846,8 @@ void elv_ioq_completed_request(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq)
 	efqd->rq_in_driver--;
 	ioq->dispatched--;
 
+	elv_update_io_rate(efqd, rq);
+
 	if (sync)
 		ioq->last_end_request = jiffies;
 
diff --git a/block/elevator-fq.h b/block/elevator-fq.h
index 5b6c1cc..a0acf32 100644
--- a/block/elevator-fq.h
+++ b/block/elevator-fq.h
@@ -169,6 +169,9 @@ struct io_queue {
 	/* Requests dispatched from this queue */
 	int dispatched;
 
+	/* Number of sectors dispatched in current dispatch round */
+	unsigned long nr_sectors;
+
 	/* Keep a track of think time of processes in this queue */
 	unsigned long last_end_request;
 	unsigned long ttime_total;
@@ -225,6 +228,14 @@ struct elv_fq_data {
 	struct work_struct unplug_work;
 
 	unsigned int elv_slice[2];
+
+	/* Fields for keeping track of average disk rate */
+	unsigned long rate_sectors; /* number of sectors finished */
+	unsigned long rate_time;   /* jiffies elapsed */
+	unsigned long mean_rate; /* sectors per jiffy */
+	unsigned long long rate_sampling_start; /*sampling window start jifies*/
+	/* number of sectors finished io during current sampling window */
+	unsigned long rate_sectors_current;
 };
 
 extern int elv_slice_idle;
-- 
1.6.0.6

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/