Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756067AbZFTKc0 (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Jun 2009 06:32:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751690AbZFTKcT (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Jun 2009 06:32:19 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:34822 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751384AbZFTKcT (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Jun 2009 06:32:19 -0400 Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 12:32:06 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: Kumar Gala , Paul Mackerras , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Peter Zijlstra , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] perf_counter: powerpc: Enable use of software counters on 32-bit powerpc Message-ID: <20090620103206.GA13814@elte.hu> References: <19000.55404.103840.393470@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20090617142151.GB6846@elte.hu> <8C6954A9-BE4C-47F5-AD87-A1D0EAF43F8A@kernel.crashing.org> <20090617142719.GC6846@elte.hu> <1245366204.8693.11.camel@pasglop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1245366204.8693.11.camel@pasglop> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.5 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0001] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1154 Lines: 29 * Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 16:27 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > I think it would be nice to have more platform support in .31. > > Perfcounters is a brand-new feature so there's no risk of > > regression. In the end it will depend on Linus to pull of course, > > and BenH can veto it too if he'd like no more PowerPC changes in > > this cycle. Worst-case it's all .32 material. > > There have been little PowerPC changes in this cycle and I agree > with you on that it's a nice feature to have with little risk of > regression. Ok - thanks - i'll push it to Linus probably later today. > In fact, I also have an up-to-date (and hopefully working) > irqtrace/lockdep patch for 32-bit powerpc (we only do 64-bit right > now) that I'm considering merging this time around, the benefit it > brings is worth the risk I believe. Nice :-) Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/