Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 3 Dec 2000 09:14:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 3 Dec 2000 09:13:57 -0500 Received: from mandrakesoft.mandrakesoft.com ([216.71.84.35]:40992 "EHLO mandrakesoft.mandrakesoft.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 3 Dec 2000 09:13:44 -0500 Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2000 07:43:01 -0600 (CST) From: Jeff Garzik To: Keith Owens cc: Donald Becker , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: [RFC] Configuring synchronous interfaces in Linux In-Reply-To: <2776.975802846@ocs3.ocs-net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 3 Dec 2000, Keith Owens wrote: > If you go down this path, please add a standard performance monitoring > method to query the current capacity of an interface. > to report "eth0 is handling 1 Megabyte/second, but we cannot tell if > that is 90% (10BaseT) or 9% (100BaseT) utilization". We should report > capacity rather than speed because speed alone is not the controlling > factor, other things like half or full duplex affect the capacity. Well, ethtool interface supports reporting media selection as well as [re]setting media setting. I dunno if we could report what capacity an interface is handling without adding code to hot paths... Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/