Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 7 Mar 2002 10:32:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 7 Mar 2002 10:32:48 -0500 Received: from e31.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.129]:7362 "EHLO e31.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 7 Mar 2002 10:32:32 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Hubertus Franke Reply-To: frankeh@watson.ibm.com Organization: IBM Research To: arjanv@redhat.com, Rusty Russell Subject: Re: furwocks: Fast Userspace Read/Write Locks Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 10:33:32 -0500 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.1] Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <3C8761FF.A10E50D9@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <3C8761FF.A10E50D9@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <20020307153228.3A6773FE06@smtp.linux.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 07 March 2002 07:50 am, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > Rusty Russell wrote: > > This is a userspace implementation of rwlocks on top of futexes. > > question: if rwlocks aren't actually slower in the fast path than > futexes, > would it make sense to only do the rw variant and in some userspace > layer > map "traditional" semaphores to write locks ? > Saves half the implementation and testing.... > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ I m not in favor of that. The dominant lock will be mutexes. -- -- Hubertus Franke (frankeh@watson.ibm.com) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/