Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 7 Mar 2002 11:06:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 7 Mar 2002 11:05:53 -0500 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:65295 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 7 Mar 2002 11:05:30 -0500 Subject: Re: [RFC] Arch option to touch newly allocated pages To: phillips@bonn-fries.net (Daniel Phillips) Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 16:19:22 +0000 (GMT) Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), yodaiken@fsmlabs.com, jdike@karaya.com (Jeff Dike), bcrl@redhat.com (Benjamin LaHaise), hpa@zytor.com (H. Peter Anvin), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: from "Daniel Phillips" at Mar 07, 2002 04:32:46 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Higher order allocation - imho we can fix that too, eventually, however it's a lot > more work. First we have to have reliable physical defragmentation. > > > And if we are OOM - we want to return NULL > > What good does that do? It allows us to continue. It avoids the deadlocks. It lets the caller make an intelligent decision. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/