Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751805AbZFVSqw (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jun 2009 14:46:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751585AbZFVSqp (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jun 2009 14:46:45 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:33901 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752030AbZFVSqo (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jun 2009 14:46:44 -0400 Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 11:44:08 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds X-X-Sender: torvalds@localhost.localdomain To: Bernd Schmidt cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Blackfin Architecture Team , David Howells , stable@kernel.org Subject: Re: Fix for shared flat binary format in 2.6.30 In-Reply-To: <4A3F5EAE.7020402@t-online.de> Message-ID: References: <4A3F5EAE.7020402@t-online.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.01 (LFD 1184 2008-12-16) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1372 Lines: 34 On Mon, 22 Jun 2009, Bernd Schmidt wrote: > > This fixes a crash in 2.6.30 with shared flat binaries. prepare_binfmt now > requires a cred pointer to be set up, which isn't done in binfmt_flat.c. This has so many bugs in patch submission that I literally almost gave up despite it being a trivial patch. Attachements, wrong separators between explanation, wrong patch format (hint: use "-p1" or some sane patch system that gets things right _without_ crap), you name it. Very irritating. I'm generally not interested in cleaning up after people who can't bother to try to make patches in the right format. If you can't bother to spend the small amount of time to make sure the patch is properly formatted, why should I bother to apply it? It literally looks like you used SVN to generate that sh*t-for-brains patch. If you have to use svn, at least learn to make it generate proper patches. (How? I don't know. Maybe "svn diff -p1" works? Why would _anybody_ ever use SVN for the kernel anyway? The "S" stands for "Substandard"). I applied this patch, but I want to just vent my frustration with it. Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/