Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 7 Mar 2002 16:13:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 7 Mar 2002 16:13:13 -0500 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:50445 "HELO netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 7 Mar 2002 16:12:56 -0500 Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 18:12:33 -0300 (BRT) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@imladris.surriel.com To: Cort Dougan Cc: Andrew Morton , Subject: Re: Petition Against Official Endorsement of BitKeeper by Linux Maintainers In-Reply-To: <20020307135043.K9231@host110.fsmlabs.com> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Cort Dougan wrote: > We're here to discuss kernel development, right? Not debate software > ideologies. > > I move the PPC tree over to BitKeeper and it was worthwhile. The development speed and code quality of -rmap have also gone up as a consequence of moving over to bitkeeper. Merging patches up to a new version of the kernel has gone from tiring (with patch and vi) to almost relaxing (with bitkeeper's automatic and graphical 2-way merge tools)... This in turn has allowed me to spend my time and energy on improving the code, without having to fear large patches and the maintenance those require. regards, Rik -- http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/