Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751256AbZFWMGN (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jun 2009 08:06:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751770AbZFWMF7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jun 2009 08:05:59 -0400 Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:54917 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750777AbZFWMF6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jun 2009 08:05:58 -0400 To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: liqin.chen@sunplusct.com, Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: S+core architecture (arch/score/) support files From: Andi Kleen References: <200906231143.22985.arnd@arndb.de> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 14:06:00 +0200 In-Reply-To: <200906231143.22985.arnd@arndb.de> (Arnd Bergmann's message of "Tue, 23 Jun 2009 11:43:22 +0200") Message-ID: <87zlbz17fb.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 868 Lines: 22 Arnd Bergmann writes: > > Unfortunately, I don't think that the score glibc has been fully > ported to support this, so it also means that the version that is > being submitted has undergone any run-time testing. I did check > that it compiles fine but could not do more in lack of hardware > or even just a user space distro. IMHO a full successfull LTP run should be minimal criterium for merging an architecture. That should catch most of the possible "simple" mistakes in the syscall ABI. I would suggest to wait to after this has been done. -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/