Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 7 Mar 2002 17:02:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 7 Mar 2002 17:02:39 -0500 Received: from mx2out.umbc.edu ([130.85.253.52]:62719 "EHLO mx2out.umbc.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 7 Mar 2002 17:02:27 -0500 Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 17:01:54 -0500 From: John Jasen X-X-Sender: To: michael bernstein cc: Larry McVoy , Andrew Morton , Troy Benjegerdes , Pavel Machek , Kent Borg , The Open Source Club at The Ohio State University , , Subject: Re: [opensource] Re: Petition Against Official Endorsement of BitKeeper by Linux Maintainers In-Reply-To: <10B32CBD-320F-11D6-BAF0-003065C60BC2@osu.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, michael bernstein wrote: > Get over the money issue though. There are a lot of > people who could benefit from bitkeeper being opensourced, so why not go > and do it? rent. food. clothing. basic necessities and whatnot. Just a thought. > Serve others, not yourself. I begin to smell the exuberance of youthful ideology. Does anyone have a can of Lysol I can borrow? BK belongs to bitmover. They can do whatever they want with it. Deal. -- -- John E. Jasen (jjasen1@umbc.edu) -- In theory, theory and practise are the same. In practise, they aren't. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/