Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 7 Mar 2002 17:29:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 7 Mar 2002 17:29:20 -0500 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:38151 "HELO netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 7 Mar 2002 17:29:02 -0500 Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 19:27:49 -0300 (BRT) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@imladris.surriel.com To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Arch option to touch newly allocated pages In-Reply-To: <3C87E859.427EC3C7@zip.com.au> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Andrew Morton wrote: > > use-once reduces the VM to FIFO order, which suffers from > > belady's anomaly so it doesn't matter much how much memory > > you throw at it > > > > drop-behind will suffer the same problem once the readahead > > memory is too large to keep in the system, but at least the > > already-used pages won't kick out readahead pages > > err.. Was there a fix in there somewhere, or are we stuck? Imagine how TCP backoff would work if it kept old packets around and would drop random packets because of too many old packets in the buffers. I suspect that the readahead window resizing might work when we throw away the already-used streaming IO pages before we start throwing away any pages we're about to use. regards, Rik -- http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/