Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 7 Mar 2002 17:58:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 7 Mar 2002 17:57:59 -0500 Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237]:57838 "EHLO passion.cambridge.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 7 Mar 2002 17:57:40 -0500 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 From: David Woodhouse X-Accept-Language: en_GB In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: To: Alan Cox Cc: phillips@bonn-fries.net (Daniel Phillips), yodaiken@fsmlabs.com, jdike@karaya.com (Jeff Dike), bcrl@redhat.com (Benjamin LaHaise), hpa@zytor.com (H. Peter Anvin), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Arch option to touch newly allocated pages Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2002 22:57:12 +0000 Message-ID: <1916.1015541832@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk said: > None at all. If you needed the memory before you committed to an > operation you should have reserved it before you started. See "sloppy > coders" This is true. I must admit I was having trouble trying to think of a real case where the latter applied in _sane_ code. -- dwmw2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/