Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 7 Mar 2002 19:04:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 7 Mar 2002 19:04:35 -0500 Received: from hq.fsmlabs.com ([209.155.42.197]:39686 "EHLO hq.fsmlabs.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 7 Mar 2002 19:04:14 -0500 From: Cort Dougan Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 17:03:34 -0700 To: Rik van Riel Cc: "Jonathan A. George" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Kernel SCM: When does CVS fall down where it REALLY matters? Message-ID: <20020307170334.D5423@host110.fsmlabs.com> In-Reply-To: <3C87FD12.8060800@greshamstorage.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from riel@conectiva.com.br on Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 08:59:47PM -0300 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Only doing a given merge once is great. That's a big time-saver over the long term. } 1) working merges } } 2) atomic checkins of entire patches, fast tags } } 3) graphical 2-way merging tool like bitkeeper has } (this might not seem essential to people who have } never used it, but it has saved me many many hours) } } 4) distributed repositories } } 5) ability to exchange changesets by email } } regards, } } Rik } -- } } } http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ } } - } To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in } the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org } More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html } Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/