Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S310721AbSCHH5H>; Fri, 8 Mar 2002 02:57:07 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S310719AbSCHH46>; Fri, 8 Mar 2002 02:56:58 -0500
Received: from userk185.dsl.pipex.com ([62.188.58.185]:52970 "EHLO
	userk185.dsl.pipex.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S293680AbSCHH4t>; Fri, 8 Mar 2002 02:56:49 -0500
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 07:56:47 +0000
From: Sean Hunter <sean@uncarved.com>
To: Stephen Samuel <samuel@bcgreen.com>
Cc: "Matthew D. Pitts" <mpitts@suite224.net>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        "Jeff V. Merkey" <jmerkey@vger.timpanogas.org>
Subject: Re: Petition Against Official Endorsement of BitKeeper by Linux Maintainers
Message-ID: <20020308075647.GA13736@uncarved.com>
Mail-Followup-To: Sean Hunter <sean@uncarved.com>,
	Stephen Samuel <samuel@bcgreen.com>,
	"Matthew D. Pitts" <mpitts@suite224.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Jeff V. Merkey" <jmerkey@vger.timpanogas.org>
In-Reply-To: <20020305165233.A28212@fireball.zosima.org> <20020305154147.A6211@vger.timpanogas.org> <3C8554F4.9000403@bcgreen.com> <004301c1c4a6$ab218340$b0d3fea9@pcs686> <3C881649.2030000@bcgreen.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3C881649.2030000@bcgreen.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


--gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 05:39:21PM -0800, Stephen Samuel wrote:
>=20
> note: this solution DOES NOT PRECLUDE YOU (or anybody else) FROM
> USING BITKEEPER (or any other proprietary solution) in the privacy of
> your office and/or home -- even if you want to do Linux development
> with it.  It's simply about what occurs in the OFFICIAL Linux kernel
> code tree, which probably has a reasonably high proportion of people
> who are both politically and financially sensitive to the idea of
> being almost required to use an closed source product to work on
> their open source 'baby'.
>=20

You left off:

  We support your right to have babies, even though you can't have=20
     babies, which is nobodies fault, not even Larry McVoy's.

Thanks for giving everyone your permission to use bitkeeper in the privacy =
of
their own home.  Its nice to know you think anyone gives a fuck about your
opinion. Now kindly sod off and stop wasting everybodies time.

Sean


--gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8iG6+AgJf0xrWsZwRAv3CAJ9jcAbRAOMQZmFdgu/OH+kR1h7OPACgkXvA
670On2JLq9SrI8wdJSQj554=
=B2rI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/