Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752388AbZFYM0A (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Jun 2009 08:26:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752133AbZFYMZt (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Jun 2009 08:25:49 -0400 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:45046 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751366AbZFYMZs (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Jun 2009 08:25:48 -0400 Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 14:25:45 +0200 From: Jiri Olsa To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, fbl@redhat.com, nhorman@redhat.com, davem@redhat.com, oleg@redhat.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com Subject: [PATCH] net: fix race in the receive/select Message-ID: <20090625122545.GA3625@jolsa.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 8800 Lines: 246 Adding memory barrier to the __pollwait function paired with receive callbacks. The smp_mb__after_lock define is added, since {read|write|spin}_lock() on x86 are full memory barriers. The race fires, when following code paths meet, and the tp->rcv_nxt and __add_wait_queue updates stay in CPU caches. CPU1 CPU2 sys_select receive packet ... ... __add_wait_queue update tp->rcv_nxt ... ... tp->rcv_nxt check sock_def_readable ... { schedule ... if (sk->sk_sleep && waitqueue_active(sk->sk_sleep)) wake_up_interruptible(sk->sk_sleep) ... } If there was no cache the code would work ok, since the wait_queue and rcv_nxt are opposit to each other. Meaning that once tp->rcv_nxt is updated by CPU2, the CPU1 either already passed the tp->rcv_nxt check and sleeps, or will get the new value for tp->rcv_nxt and will return with new data mask. In both cases the process (CPU1) is being added to the wait queue, so the waitqueue_active (CPU2) call cannot miss and will wake up CPU1. The bad case is when the __add_wait_queue changes done by CPU1 stay in its cache, and so does the tp->rcv_nxt update on CPU2 side. The CPU1 will then endup calling schedule and sleep forever if there are no more data on the socket. wbr, jirka Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa --- arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h | 3 +++ fs/select.c | 4 ++++ include/linux/spinlock.h | 5 +++++ include/net/sock.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ net/atm/common.c | 4 ++-- net/core/sock.c | 8 ++++---- net/dccp/output.c | 2 +- net/iucv/af_iucv.c | 2 +- net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c | 2 +- net/unix/af_unix.c | 2 +- 10 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h index b7e5db8..39ecc5f 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h @@ -302,4 +302,7 @@ static inline void __raw_write_unlock(raw_rwlock_t *rw) #define _raw_read_relax(lock) cpu_relax() #define _raw_write_relax(lock) cpu_relax() +/* The {read|write|spin}_lock() on x86 are full memory barriers. */ +#define smp_mb__after_lock() do { } while (0) + #endif /* _ASM_X86_SPINLOCK_H */ diff --git a/fs/select.c b/fs/select.c index d870237..c4bd5f0 100644 --- a/fs/select.c +++ b/fs/select.c @@ -219,6 +219,10 @@ static void __pollwait(struct file *filp, wait_queue_head_t *wait_address, init_waitqueue_func_entry(&entry->wait, pollwake); entry->wait.private = pwq; add_wait_queue(wait_address, &entry->wait); + + /* This memory barrier is paired with the smp_mb__after_lock + * in the sk_has_sleeper. */ + smp_mb(); } int poll_schedule_timeout(struct poll_wqueues *pwq, int state, diff --git a/include/linux/spinlock.h b/include/linux/spinlock.h index 252b245..ae053bd 100644 --- a/include/linux/spinlock.h +++ b/include/linux/spinlock.h @@ -132,6 +132,11 @@ do { \ #endif /*__raw_spin_is_contended*/ #endif +/* The lock does not imply full memory barrier. */ +#ifndef smp_mb__after_lock +#define smp_mb__after_lock() smp_mb() +#endif + /** * spin_unlock_wait - wait until the spinlock gets unlocked * @lock: the spinlock in question. diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h index 352f06b..7fbb143 100644 --- a/include/net/sock.h +++ b/include/net/sock.h @@ -1241,6 +1241,24 @@ static inline int sk_has_allocations(const struct sock *sk) return sk_wmem_alloc_get(sk) || sk_rmem_alloc_get(sk); } +/** + * sk_has_sleeper - check if there are any waiting processes + * @sk: socket + * + * Returns true if socket has waiting processes + */ +static inline int sk_has_sleeper(struct sock *sk) +{ + /* + * We need to be sure we are in sync with the + * add_wait_queue modifications to the wait queue. + * + * This memory barrier is paired in the __pollwait. + */ + smp_mb__after_lock(); + return sk->sk_sleep && waitqueue_active(sk->sk_sleep); +} + /* * Queue a received datagram if it will fit. Stream and sequenced * protocols can't normally use this as they need to fit buffers in diff --git a/net/atm/common.c b/net/atm/common.c index c1c9793..67a8642 100644 --- a/net/atm/common.c +++ b/net/atm/common.c @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ static void vcc_sock_destruct(struct sock *sk) static void vcc_def_wakeup(struct sock *sk) { read_lock(&sk->sk_callback_lock); - if (sk->sk_sleep && waitqueue_active(sk->sk_sleep)) + if (sk_has_sleeper(sk)) wake_up(sk->sk_sleep); read_unlock(&sk->sk_callback_lock); } @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ static void vcc_write_space(struct sock *sk) read_lock(&sk->sk_callback_lock); if (vcc_writable(sk)) { - if (sk->sk_sleep && waitqueue_active(sk->sk_sleep)) + if (sk_has_sleeper(sk)) wake_up_interruptible(sk->sk_sleep); sk_wake_async(sk, SOCK_WAKE_SPACE, POLL_OUT); diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c index b0ba569..6354863 100644 --- a/net/core/sock.c +++ b/net/core/sock.c @@ -1715,7 +1715,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(sock_no_sendpage); static void sock_def_wakeup(struct sock *sk) { read_lock(&sk->sk_callback_lock); - if (sk->sk_sleep && waitqueue_active(sk->sk_sleep)) + if (sk_has_sleeper(sk)) wake_up_interruptible_all(sk->sk_sleep); read_unlock(&sk->sk_callback_lock); } @@ -1723,7 +1723,7 @@ static void sock_def_wakeup(struct sock *sk) static void sock_def_error_report(struct sock *sk) { read_lock(&sk->sk_callback_lock); - if (sk->sk_sleep && waitqueue_active(sk->sk_sleep)) + if (sk_has_sleeper(sk)) wake_up_interruptible_poll(sk->sk_sleep, POLLERR); sk_wake_async(sk, SOCK_WAKE_IO, POLL_ERR); read_unlock(&sk->sk_callback_lock); @@ -1732,7 +1732,7 @@ static void sock_def_error_report(struct sock *sk) static void sock_def_readable(struct sock *sk, int len) { read_lock(&sk->sk_callback_lock); - if (sk->sk_sleep && waitqueue_active(sk->sk_sleep)) + if (sk_has_sleeper(sk)) wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(sk->sk_sleep, POLLIN | POLLRDNORM | POLLRDBAND); sk_wake_async(sk, SOCK_WAKE_WAITD, POLL_IN); @@ -1747,7 +1747,7 @@ static void sock_def_write_space(struct sock *sk) * progress. --DaveM */ if ((atomic_read(&sk->sk_wmem_alloc) << 1) <= sk->sk_sndbuf) { - if (sk->sk_sleep && waitqueue_active(sk->sk_sleep)) + if (sk_has_sleeper(sk)) wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(sk->sk_sleep, POLLOUT | POLLWRNORM | POLLWRBAND); diff --git a/net/dccp/output.c b/net/dccp/output.c index c0e88c1..c96119f 100644 --- a/net/dccp/output.c +++ b/net/dccp/output.c @@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ void dccp_write_space(struct sock *sk) { read_lock(&sk->sk_callback_lock); - if (sk->sk_sleep && waitqueue_active(sk->sk_sleep)) + if (sk_has_sleeper(sk)) wake_up_interruptible(sk->sk_sleep); /* Should agree with poll, otherwise some programs break */ if (sock_writeable(sk)) diff --git a/net/iucv/af_iucv.c b/net/iucv/af_iucv.c index 6be5f92..ba0149d 100644 --- a/net/iucv/af_iucv.c +++ b/net/iucv/af_iucv.c @@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ static inline int iucv_below_msglim(struct sock *sk) static void iucv_sock_wake_msglim(struct sock *sk) { read_lock(&sk->sk_callback_lock); - if (sk->sk_sleep && waitqueue_active(sk->sk_sleep)) + if (sk_has_sleeper(sk)) wake_up_interruptible_all(sk->sk_sleep); sk_wake_async(sk, SOCK_WAKE_SPACE, POLL_OUT); read_unlock(&sk->sk_callback_lock); diff --git a/net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c b/net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c index eac5e7b..60e0e38 100644 --- a/net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c +++ b/net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static void rxrpc_write_space(struct sock *sk) _enter("%p", sk); read_lock(&sk->sk_callback_lock); if (rxrpc_writable(sk)) { - if (sk->sk_sleep && waitqueue_active(sk->sk_sleep)) + if (sk_has_sleeper(sk)) wake_up_interruptible(sk->sk_sleep); sk_wake_async(sk, SOCK_WAKE_SPACE, POLL_OUT); } diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c index 36d4e44..143143a 100644 --- a/net/unix/af_unix.c +++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ static void unix_write_space(struct sock *sk) { read_lock(&sk->sk_callback_lock); if (unix_writable(sk)) { - if (sk->sk_sleep && waitqueue_active(sk->sk_sleep)) + if (sk_has_sleeper(sk)) wake_up_interruptible_sync(sk->sk_sleep); sk_wake_async(sk, SOCK_WAKE_SPACE, POLL_OUT); } -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/