Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 8 Mar 2002 04:15:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 8 Mar 2002 04:15:31 -0500 Received: from [195.63.194.11] ([195.63.194.11]:47377 "EHLO mail.stock-world.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 8 Mar 2002 04:15:21 -0500 Message-ID: <3C8880EF.5030602@evision-ventures.com> Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2002 10:14:23 +0100 From: Martin Dalecki User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020205 X-Accept-Language: en-us, pl MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Arjan van de Ven CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Submitting PROMISE IDE Controllers Driver Patch In-Reply-To: <200203080823.g288NC514338@fenrus.demon.nl> <3C8877D7.2020708@evision-ventures.com> <20020308085028.A14375@fenrus.demon.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 09:35:35AM +0100, Martin Dalecki wrote: > >>Please look closer at my posting. I just think, that since there >>are apparently no tru hardware raid devices out there it would >>be sufficient to expand the detection code to not ignore >>RAID class devices at all. This would just prevent >>us from having two different entries in the >>device detection list. Not much more involved I think. >> > > There's one tiny glitch: there are exactly 2 "real" raid devices out there > (that I know of at least). But anyway, a "don't look at" list will be > MUCH shorter than a "look also at" list. Would you dare to tell me which those are? And are you sure they don't expose themself as SCSI hosts to the system on PCI? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/