Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758649AbZFZJL6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Jun 2009 05:11:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757489AbZFZJLp (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Jun 2009 05:11:45 -0400 Received: from mail.open.by ([193.232.92.17]:49623 "EHLO post.open.by" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757784AbZFZJLo (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Jun 2009 05:11:44 -0400 X-SpamTest-Envelope-From: sergey.senozhatsky@mail.by X-SpamTest-Group-ID: 00000000 X-SpamTest-Info: Profiles 8838 [Jun 25 2009] X-SpamTest-Info: helo_type=3 X-SpamTest-Info: {relay has no DNS name} X-SpamTest-Method: none X-SpamTest-Rate: 55 X-SpamTest-SPF: softfail X-SpamTest-Status: Not detected X-SpamTest-Status-Extended: not_detected X-SpamTest-Version: SMTP-Filter Version 3.0.0 [0284], KAS30/Release Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 12:13:17 +0300 From: Sergey Senozhatsky To: Catalin Marinas Cc: Pekka Enberg , Ingo Molnar , "Paul E. McKenney" , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: kmemleak suggestion (long message) Message-ID: <20090626091316.GD3451@localdomain.by> References: <20090625221816.GA3480@localdomain.by> <20090626065923.GA14078@elte.hu> <84144f020906260007u3e79086bv91900e487ba0fb50@mail.gmail.com> <20090626081452.GB3451@localdomain.by> <1246004270.27533.16.camel@penberg-laptop> <20090626085056.GC3451@localdomain.by> <1246006463.30717.12.camel@pc1117.cambridge.arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1246006463.30717.12.camel@pc1117.cambridge.arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 999 Lines: 29 On (06/26/09 09:54), Catalin Marinas wrote: > > Well, we just move 'spam' out of syslog. Not dealing with 'spam' itself. > > I'm not sure about 'filtering in userspace when you read'. Suppose I use > > 'tail -f /debug/mm/kmemleak'. How can I easy suppress printing of (for example): > > I don't have a strong opinion on this patch at the moment, I'll have a > look later today. > Well, take a look please. I find it (suggested mechanism) to be useful. > > Or any report with tty_ldisc_try_get (ppp generates tons of them). > > BTW, that's a real leak IMHO (posted a patch yesterday in reply to the > initial report to Alan Cox). > I'll try to find link to see it. Since tty_ldisc_try_get reports started to 'annoy' me. > -- > Catalin > Sergey -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/